Will I Manage Agents as I Would Employees?

AI agents are joining our teams. But will we manage them like employees? Here’s my take from the edge of strategy, automation, and organisational design.

Will I Manage Agents as I Would Employees?

As businesses rapidly integrate digital agents, powered by AI, GPTs, and automated systems, leaders are grappling with new questions: Can these digital agents simply slot into our existing organisational structures, or do they require entirely new management approaches?

A New Type of Workforce

I'm not a Corporate Enterprise. I'm not leading thousands of employees. I'm an entrepreneur, a digital strategist, experimenting with digital agents daily.

And here's what I see clearly: digital agents are increasingly acting like team members rather than mere tools.

For instance, I use GPT-based agents to write, analyse, summarise meetings, and organise tasks. They're reliable, available around the clock, and relentlessly consistent. But does that mean I manage them like employees?

💡
By the way, AI does three things with work and employees.

It makes them/us redundant, it changes the work and it creates new work.

I only see the latter happening moderately so there is still a lot of change (and unrest) waiting for us. To be continued.

Managing Similarities: Clear Tasks, Clear Results

Like human team members, digital agents need clear tasks and expectations. Ambiguity isn't good for AI, just as it isn't good for people. Defining clear objectives, KPIs, and tasks helps digital agents excel, much as it helps human employees thrive.

Where Management Differs: Motivation and Learning

Yet, there are critical differences. Digital agents don't need motivation or morale boosting. They don't seek growth opportunities or emotional support. However, they require careful and continuous training, often supervised, to ensure accuracy, fairness, and relevance.

Unlike humans, agents don't naturally learn from experience. They must be explicitly trained, retrained, and guided.

Organisational Shifts

Consider Moderna’s recent shift, merging HR and Tech departments. This move signals a profound realignment around the combined value of humans and digital agents.

Why Moderna Merged Its Tech and HR Departments | Isabelle Bousquette | 33 comments
In my latest for The Wall Street Journal, I delve into why vaccine-maker Moderna decided to merge its technology and HR departments. I've heard a lot of tech leaders say they're working more closely than ever with HR as they think through the implications that genAI will have on the workforce (a lot of companies have cited genAI efficiencies as a reason for job cuts, for example). But Moderna's decision to merge the two roles takes things one step further. Tracey Franklin, who joined Moderna as its HR chief and is now its chief people and digital technology officer, told me she is using the opportunity to redesign teams across the company based on what work is best done by people versus what can be automated with technology, including the tech it leverages from a partnership with OpenAI. Roles are being created, eliminated and reimagined as a result, she said. Real the full story here for exactly how Moderna is using OpenAI tech internally and what kind of impact it's having on the workforce there: https://lnkd.in/en7fsehw And then let me know what you think. Would it make sense to merge tech and HR at your organization? | 33 comments on LinkedIn

Professor Venkat Venkatraman calls this the shift into the "agentic era"—organisations designed around the combined strength of biological and digital agents.

My Perspective

From my position, managing agents feels less like traditional management and more like orchestration. It's about clearly defining roles, ensuring seamless integration between humans and AI, and continually refining processes.

Digital agents won't replace management, they will redefine it. Leaders will become architects of hybrid teams, curators of collaborative ecosystems, and continuous optimisers of workflows.

Looking Forward

As more businesses adopt digital agents, these distinctions will become central. Managing digital agents effectively means understanding their unique needs and integrating them into an agile, adaptive organisational structure.

Will we manage digital agents exactly like human employees? Probably not. But we'll certainly manage them with equal care, strategic clarity, and deliberate intent.

After all, agents, may they be human or digital, work best when given clear purpose, clear tasks, and clear boundaries. And that's something every good manager already knows.